Preferring maximum confirmation diagnoses
نویسنده
چکیده
Models used for Model-Based Diagnosis usually assume that the inaccuracy of data is smaller than the precision with which the data is described. In some domains, however, this assumption is invalid. Observations may not be accurate or the behavior model of the system does not allow for accurate predictions. Therefore, the accuracy of predictions, which is a function of the accuracy of the observed system inputs and the behavior model of the system, may differ from the accuracy of the observed system outputs. This paper investigates the consequences of using inaccurate values. The paper will show that traditional notions of preferred diagnoses such as abductive diagnosis and minimum consistency-based diagnosis are no longer suited if the available data has different accuracies. A new notion of preferred diagnoses, called maximum confirmation diagnoses, is introduced.
منابع مشابه
How Much Overtesting Is Needed to Safely Exclude a Diagnosis? A Different Perspective on Triage Testing Using Bayes' Theorem
Ruling out disease often requires expensive or potentially harmful confirmation testing. For such testing, a less invasive triage test is often used. Intuitively, few negative confirmatory tests suggest success of this approach. However, if negative confirmation tests become too rare, too many disease cases could have been missed. It is therefore important to know how many negative tests are ne...
متن کاملDiagnosis of Simple Temporal Networks
In many domains successful execution of plans requires careful monitoring and repair. Diagnosis of plan execution supports this process by identifying causes of plan failure. Most plans have to satisfy temporal constraints. An important and common occurring problem during plan execution are violations of temporal plan constraints. This paper addresses diagnosis of such temporal constraint viola...
متن کاملThe accuracy of diagnoses as reported in families with cancer: a retrospective study.
Assessment of risk of developing hereditary cancer and subsequent clinical surveillance is largely based on family history. It is considered standard practice to confirm as many diagnoses as possible in cancer families. Our aim was (1) to assess inaccuracies in reporting of cancers by families, (2) to assess the need for confirmation of diagnosis, and (3) to estimate how many families would hav...
متن کاملToxidrome-based Approach to Common Poisonings
Poisoning remains a major cause of hospital admission into the emergency department and intensive care unit. Proper diagnosis is the cornerstone for optimal management of poisoned patients. Since the definitive analytical confirmation of the nature of the toxicant involved in the poisoning cannot be rapidly obtained in the majority of healthcare facilities, diagnosis relies on the medical histo...
متن کاملFirst Confirmed Metastatic Adamantinoma of the Spine: Case Report and Literature Review
Study Design Case report and literature review. Objective To present the first case of metastatic adamantinoma of the spine with immunohistochemical confirmation and an updated literature review. Summary of Background Data Spinal metastatic disease could be difficult to diagnose because of the multiple differential diagnoses involved. Spinal surgeons must be aware of unusual primary extra-axial...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009